🔗 Share this article

Through a unsigned order, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to employ a redrawn congressional district plan that may create several five additional GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 order, issued on Thursday, approves a request by the state to set aside a district court's block that had struck down the boundaries in November.

Justices' Rationale

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disrupting the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the order stated in explaining its action.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely sorted voters according to their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the boundaries. It had ordered the state to use the boundaries created after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Dissent

Through a forcefully written dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's decision. She argued that it disrespected the work of the lower court, noting that its opinion was actually authored by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its increased favoritism, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced repeatedly, is a violation of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

The court's action comes amid a nationwide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican hold. Typically, boundary revision takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that might create a number of more conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State AG hailed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures representation favorable to the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

Conversely, Democratic leaders lamented the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major party election organization.

Another top House leader stated the court had once again damaged its credibility by upholding a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he concluded.